Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Using Hydropneumatic Fogging Systems in Greenhouses for Cuttings and Germination

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32515/2414-3820.2026.56.17-26

Keywords:

hydropneumatic system, nebulizer, fogger, microdisperse irrigation, seed germination, green cuttings, greenhouse microclimate, energy efficiency

Abstract

The article presents a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of using hydropneumatic (nebulizer) fogging systems in comparison with fogging systems of other types to create optimal microclimate conditions in greenhouses during green cuttings or seed germination. The relevance of the study is due to the need to increase the productivity of greenhouse production in conditions of limited water resources, climate change and requirements for high-quality planting material.

The interdependence of the main parameters of the microclimate (temperature, relative humidity of air and soil, ventilation, CO₂ concentration, lighting level) is considered. It is shown that microdispersed (aerosol) irrigation is an indispensable element of modern agricultural technologies, as it provides delicate, uniform moistening, preventing drying out and overmoistening of the substrate, promotes healthy development of the root system and reduces the risk of fungal diseases.

A comparative analysis of six types of foggers with different key technical and operational characteristics was performed: operating pressure, water flow rate, droplet size and cooling and humidification efficiency. Low and medium pressure systems (0.25 – 0.6 MPa) form droplets of 45 – 160 μm and are characterized by partial water deposition on the surface of plants, which limits their effectiveness. High pressure systems (5 – 7 MPa, Ender) create ultra-fine fog (5 – 20 μm), ensuring almost complete evaporation of water in the air, significant water savings (up to 70%) and effective adiabatic cooling (temperature reduction by 5 – 15 °C).

The highest level of dispersion and accuracy of microclimate regulation is demonstrated by hydropneumatic nebulizer systems (TurboFog), which operate on a combination of water (1.2 – 3.0 MPa) and compressed air (0.2 – 0.25 MPa) and form a droplet size of 3 – 40 microns. Such systems provide maximum humidification and cooling efficiency, but are accompanied by the need to use a more complex system with compressor equipment. It has been proven that the use of microdispersed fogging allows you to significantly reduce mechanical stress for cuttings and sprouts, reduce leaf wetting (reducing the risk of pathogens), implement foliar feeding and disinfection, and also easily automate the process using controllers. Comparing the efficiency, it was found that high-pressure systems are often the optimal solution for industrial greenhouses in terms of the ratio "efficiency - cost", while hydropneumatic nebulizer systems are the most promising for high-tech complexes. The choice of the type of system should be based on natural-climatic, economic and physiological factors. Further research will be aimed at developing an intelligent system for automating the creation of a microclimate, taking into account the real-time interdependence and interaction of all parameters.

Author Biography

Pavlo Luts, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University. Vinnytsia, Ukraine

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Senior Lecturer of Department of machines and equipment of agricultural production

References

1. Perdigones, A., García, J.L., Romero, A., Rodríguez, A., Luna, L., Raposo, C., & de la Plaza S. (2008) Cooling strategies for greenhouses in summer: Control of fogging by pulse width modulation. Biosystems Engineering. 99(4), 573–586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.01.001

2. Mist and fog equipment for propagation. UMass Extension Greenhouse Floriculture Fact Sheet. (n.d.). University of Massachusetts. URL: https://www.umass.edu/agriculture-food-environment/greenhouse-floriculture/fact-sheets/mist-fog-equipment-for-propagation

3. Dole, J. M., & Wilkins, H. F. (2022). Mist propagation systems and humidity chambers for the nursery and greenhouse (HLA-6708). Oklahoma State University Extension.

4. Arbel, A., Yekutieli, O., & Barak, M. (2003). Combination of forced ventilation and fogging systems for cooling greenhouses. Biosystems Engineering, 84(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1537-5110(02)00216-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1537-5110(02)00216-7

5. Öztürk, H. H. (2003). Evaporative cooling efficiency of a fogging system for greenhouses. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 27, 1–8.

6. McGaughey, R. (2017, February 28). Propagation fog system. GrowerTalks.

7. Stadnik, M., Burlaka, S., Luts, P., & Kytsenko, A. (2024). Integration of sensor technologies in the structure scheme of automated greenhouse control. Vibratsii v tekhnitsi ta tekhnolohiiakh [Vibrations in engineering and technology], 2(113), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.37128/2306-8744-2024-2-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37128/2306-8744-2024-2-13

8. MicroCool. (2024). High-pressure fog systems in controlled environment agriculture (Technical bulletin).

9. Horti Generation. (2019, November 18). Benefits of the high pressure fogging technology.

10. Tumanoutvoriuvachi dlia teplyts ta litnikh teras [Foggers for greenhouses and summer terraces]. (n.d.). AGROVINN. https://agrovinn.com/ua/kapelnyj-poliv/tumanoobrazovateli-dlya-teplic-i-letnih-terras/ [in Ukrainian].

11. Systema polyvu «Tuman» [Mist irrigation system]. (n.d.). SpetsPolyvServis. https://poliv-service.kiev.ua/ua/g105996446-sistema-poliva-tuman [in Ukrainian].

12. Tumanoutvorennia [Fog formation]. (n.d.). Rain & Fog. http://www.poliv-tuman.com.ua/tumanoutvorennia/ [in Ukrainian].

13. Systemy tumanoutvorennia ta dezinfektsii [Misting and disinfection systems]. (n.d.). Climate Service. https://climateservice.com.ua/product-category/sistemy-tumana-i-dezinfekczii [in Ukrainian].

14. Burlaka, S. A., Luts, P. M., & Kupchuk, I. M. (2024). Otsinka produktyvnosti ta enerhovytrat u hidroponitsi [Estimating productivity and energy consumption in hydroponics]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: tekhnichni nauky. [Herald of Khmelnytskyi national university: Technical sciences], 4(339), 290–295. https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5732-2024-339-4-46. [in Ukrainian].

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

uts, P. (2026). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Using Hydropneumatic Fogging Systems in Greenhouses for Cuttings and Germination. National Interagency Scientific and Technical Collection of Works Design Production and Exploitation of Agricultural Machines, (56), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.32515/2414-3820.2026.56.17-26